Goto

Collaborating Authors

 crash cart


Human-Robot Teaming Field Deployments: A Comparison Between Verbal and Non-verbal Communication

Tanjim, Tauhid, Ekpo, Promise, Cao, Huajie, George, Jonathan St., Ching, Kevin, Lee, Hee Rin, Taylor, Angelique

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Abstract-- Healthcare workers (HCWs) encounter challenges in hospitals, such as retrieving medical supplies quickly from crash carts, which could potentially result in medical errors and delays in patient care. Robotic crash carts (RCCs) have shown promise in assisting healthcare teams during medical tasks through guided object searches and task reminders. Limited exploration has been done to determine what communication modalities are most effective and least disruptive to patient care in real-world settings. T o address this gap, we conducted a between-subjects experiment comparing the RCC's verbal and non-verbal communication of object search with a standard crash cart in resuscitation scenarios to understand the impact of robot communication on workload and attitudes toward using robots in the workplace. Our findings indicate that verbal communication significantly reduced mental demand and effort compared to visual cues and with a traditional crash cart. Although, frustration levels were slightly higher during collaborations with the robot compared to a traditional cart. These research insights provide valuable implications for human-robot teamwork in high-stakes environments.


Rapidly Built Medical Crash Cart! Lessons Learned and Impacts on High-Stakes Team Collaboration in the Emergency Room

Taylor, Angelique, Tanjim, Tauhid, Sack, Michael Joseph, Hirsch, Maia, Cheng, Kexin, Ching, Kevin, George, Jonathan St., Roumen, Thijs, Jung, Malte F., Lee, Hee Rin

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Rapidly Built Medical Crash Cart! Lessons Learned and Impacts on High-Stakes Team Collaboration in the Emergency Room Abstract --Designing robots to support high-stakes teamwork in emergency settings presents unique challenges, including seamless integration into fast-paced environments, facilitating effective communication among team members, and adapting to rapidly changing situations. While teleoperated robots have been successfully used in high-stakes domains such as firefighting and space exploration, autonomous robots that aid high-stakes teamwork remain underexplored. T o address this gap, we conducted a rapid prototyping process to develop a series of seemingly autonomous robot designed to assist clinical teams in the Emergency Room. We transformed a standard crash cart--which stores medical equipment and emergency supplies into a medical robotic crash cart (MCCR). The MCCR was evaluated through field deployments to assess its impact on team workload and usability, identified taxonomies of failure, and refined the MCCR in collaboration with healthcare professionals. By publicly disseminating our MCCR tutorial, we hope to encourage HRI researchers to explore the design of robots for high-stakes teamwork. Teleoperated robots have become indispensable tools for action teams--highly skilled specialist teams that collaborate in short, high-pressure events, requiring improvisation in unpredictable situations [1]. For example, disaster response teams rely on teleoperated robots and drones to aid search and rescue operations [2], [3]. High-stakes military and SW A T teams use teleoperated ordnance disposal [4] and surveillance robots [5] to keep the teams safe. Surgical teams employ teleoperated robots to perform keyhole surgeries with a level of precision that would be unimaginable without these machines [6], [7]. We built three teleoperated medical crash cart robots (MCCRs). MCCR 1 delivers supplies using a hoverboard circuit. MCCR 2 delivers supplies, recommends supplies using drawer opening capabilities, and was deployed at a medical training event which revealed insights.